- Guest
- Welcome
- Recent Posts
- COLLECTING
- Leaderboard NEW!
- Browse Sets
- MyCollect Catalog
- Guess the Grade NEW!
- VERIFY
- TheftCheck
- Report Stolen
- EXPLORE
- Pages
- Groups
- Articles
- Shows & Events
- ADVERTISE
- MyCollect Ads
Friends 9
Recent Updates
- I have the itching to post another composite pattern set I just completed. The nice draw of patterns for me is the many subsets one can focus on to collect. Nice little goals to keep my interest. The photo below represent a set of Goloid Dollars struck in copper. Of the 11 die parings of goloid's dollars struck in 1878, 1879 and 1880, 10 of these parings were struck in copper (besides the Goloid and Aluminum examples). Earlier this year I picked up my last piece that filled in my 10 piece type set. I love the look of the Morgan's coiled hair and the Bun hair liberty design along with the history for these patterns.I have the itching to post another composite pattern set I just completed. The nice draw of patterns for me is the many subsets one can focus on to collect. Nice little goals to keep my interest. The photo below represent a set of Goloid Dollars struck in copper. Of the 11 die parings of goloid's dollars struck in 1878, 1879 and 1880, 10 of these parings were struck in copper (besides the Goloid and Aluminum examples). Earlier this year I picked up my last piece that filled in my 10 piece type set. I love the look of the Morgan's coiled hair and the Bun hair liberty design along with the history for these patterns.2 Comments 0 Shares 552 ViewsPlease log in to like, share and comment!Commenting is disabled.
- Dr.Bonesvery nice indeedvery nice indeed
- 2024-03-11 22:25:41
- TalesCollectionThats a really cool set of patterns! Congrats on completing the set!Thats a really cool set of patterns! Congrats on completing the set!
- 2024-03-09 18:38:11
-
- Seems to me that us pattern collectors do not chatter very much, which is not a bad thing, however I am going to boast a little here.
I Just received my 5C Pattern J-634 from the last Simpson FUN Auction conducted by Heritage.
I make note of this as it is the 2nd to last piece I needed to complete a series of Small Denomination pattern sets of 1868/1869 that I had been assembling. I have been able to collect samples of both Nickel and copper to showcase the attempt of the mint standardize small denominations (1C, 3C and 5C) in 1868/69. Now - if I only won the 3CN in copper J619 that Dr. Bones won in the Simpson sale a couple of years ago, my story would be complete
Seems to me that us pattern collectors do not chatter very much, which is not a bad thing, however I am going to boast a little here. I Just received my 5C Pattern J-634 from the last Simpson FUN Auction conducted by Heritage. I make note of this as it is the 2nd to last piece I needed to complete a series of Small Denomination pattern sets of 1868/1869 that I had been assembling. I have been able to collect samples of both Nickel and copper to showcase the attempt of the mint standardize small denominations (1C, 3C and 5C) in 1868/69. Now - if I only won the 3CN in copper J619 that Dr. Bones won in the Simpson sale a couple of years ago, my story would be complete 😊4 Comments 0 Shares 395 ViewsCommenting is disabled.- Dr. Bones ... if one noted - I did not show the 3 blanks for the 1869 Copper Trio. partly because I was the under bidder for the Simpson 1C J667 ... However, my desire to go after that piece to start the series was diminished by the likelihood of finding a J677 3CN in Copper. US Pattern.com had noted maybe 2 appearances besides the Kagins piece in the 55- 63 time frame. Bill Rue's Pattern database did not yield any other appearances except Lot 615 in Scott & Company 12/1878 auction. Subsequent to that when I was introduced to your registry I noted that you also question the likely hood of it existences any longer. Not sure if anyone contacted Don Kagin,s to see if his father records still exist to try to confirm if it was indeed a J677. PS: Thanks for your comments about my efforts .. but I am winding down to hand full of pieces. Space is running outDr. Bones ... if one noted - I did not show the 3 blanks for the 1869 Copper Trio. partly because I was the under bidder for the Simpson 1C J667 ... However, my desire to go after that piece to start the series was diminished by the likelihood of finding a J677 3CN in Copper. US Pattern.com had noted maybe 2 appearances besides the Kagins piece in the 55- 63 time frame. Bill Rue's Pattern database did not yield any other appearances except Lot 615 in Scott & Company 12/1878 auction. Subsequent to that when I was introduced to your registry I noted that you also question the likely hood of it existences any longer. Not sure if anyone contacted Don Kagin,s to see if his father records still exist to try to confirm if it was indeed a J677. PS: Thanks for your comments about my efforts .. but I am winding down to hand full of pieces. Space is running out😄
- 2024-02-10 16:36:30
- retirednow These are auction records as I will have listed in my book 4/12/1877 Ed. Cogan Proof 640 .60 Catalogue Could be J-677 or J-678
4/12/1877 Ed. Cogan Proof 655 2.00 Catalogue Could be J-677 or J-678
12/9/1878 J.W. Scott Proof 615 .75 Catalogue Could be J-677 or J-678
9/13/1880 John Haseltine Fine 551 .15 J.F.B. Litchfield J-677 or J-678
11/26/1880 S.K. Harzfeld Fine 128 .20 J. Colvin Randall J-677 or J-678
3/14/1900 Lyman Low UNC 313 1.80 Leopold Gans dented to Brand
Could be J-677 or J-678 A very similar design to adopted design. Thick, one portion of edge sharp and dented
9/30/1952 Kagins Proof 2125 60 Louisiana Sale uneven planchet different then regular dies but fairly close resemblance,
uneven planchet almost twice as thick on one end as the other
5/15/1957 Kagins Proof 2405 56 211th sale Slightly different than regular dies. Could be J-677 or J-678
12/2/1965 Kagins Proof 2035 NS 261st sale Acquired in 1963 Slightly different then regular dies, larger flan
Descriptions are from Kagins catalogues. they tended to be sparse and have noted errors in previous catalogs relative to patterns
Credence is given to its existence as it had a presence in the ANS exhibit and Brand collection . It was described by Kagin in 9/52 listed as like J-676 different than regular dies with uneven planchet one side twice thickness as other. This makes it possibly the Gans/Brand specimen. The cataloging in 1957 and 1965 suggests a possible different specimen which may make sense as Brand appears to have had 2 specimens. It is also possible that the two patterns from Kagins sales were merely damaged J-678. Although none have surfaced with these descriptions. Descriptions are based on presumptions as it has never been specifically seen and cataloged with good descriptions but the Adams/Woodin description in the 1914 ANS exhibit would suggest the reverse of J-617A, 617B and proposed 676-A. It would appear from the Low catalog that this should be 19 mm versus the 17.9 for standard. Also, Brand records would suggest that at least one example was distributed to Armin Brand.[retirednow] These are auction records as I will have listed in my book 4/12/1877 Ed. Cogan Proof 640 .60 Catalogue Could be J-677 or J-678 4/12/1877 Ed. Cogan Proof 655 2.00 Catalogue Could be J-677 or J-678 12/9/1878 J.W. Scott Proof 615 .75 Catalogue Could be J-677 or J-678 9/13/1880 John Haseltine Fine 551 .15 J.F.B. Litchfield J-677 or J-678 11/26/1880 S.K. Harzfeld Fine 128 .20 J. Colvin Randall J-677 or J-678 3/14/1900 Lyman Low UNC 313 1.80 Leopold Gans dented to Brand Could be J-677 or J-678 A very similar design to adopted design. Thick, one portion of edge sharp and dented 9/30/1952 Kagins Proof 2125 60 Louisiana Sale uneven planchet different then regular dies but fairly close resemblance, uneven planchet almost twice as thick on one end as the other 5/15/1957 Kagins Proof 2405 56 211th sale Slightly different than regular dies. Could be J-677 or J-678 12/2/1965 Kagins Proof 2035 NS 261st sale Acquired in 1963 Slightly different then regular dies, larger flan Descriptions are from Kagins catalogues. they tended to be sparse and have noted errors in previous catalogs relative to patterns Credence is given to its existence as it had a presence in the ANS exhibit and Brand collection . It was described by Kagin in 9/52 listed as like J-676 different than regular dies with uneven planchet one side twice thickness as other. This makes it possibly the Gans/Brand specimen. The cataloging in 1957 and 1965 suggests a possible different specimen which may make sense as Brand appears to have had 2 specimens. It is also possible that the two patterns from Kagins sales were merely damaged J-678. Although none have surfaced with these descriptions. Descriptions are based on presumptions as it has never been specifically seen and cataloged with good descriptions but the Adams/Woodin description in the 1914 ANS exhibit would suggest the reverse of J-617A, 617B and proposed 676-A. It would appear from the Low catalog that this should be 19 mm versus the 17.9 for standard. Also, Brand records would suggest that at least one example was distributed to Armin Brand.- 2024-02-10 17:13:01
- Dr.Bones Thanks for the detail analysis of the piece. Nice detective work - looking forward to your book being published. Any timing update? I will one the 1st to buy one.[Dr.Bones] Thanks for the detail analysis of the piece. Nice detective work - looking forward to your book being published. Any timing update? I will one the 1st to buy one.
- 2024-02-10 20:29:51
- @retirednow Unfortunately it was a must need for me as well. I can only trace 5-7 examples of J-619. There have only been 6 sales of this pattern since 2000, Beside the Simpson example I bought, the last previous sales were by DLRC on ebay in 2/16, another Simpson coin by Stacks in 2012. So a hard one to find. By far the rarest of the 3C pieces you are trying to find in this category. Your collection is really growing and fun to watch the updates@retirednow Unfortunately it was a must need for me as well. I can only trace 5-7 examples of J-619. There have only been 6 sales of this pattern since 2000, Beside the Simpson example I bought, the last previous sales were by DLRC on ebay in 2/16, another Simpson coin by Stacks in 2012. So a hard one to find. By far the rarest of the 3C pieces you are trying to find in this category. Your collection is really growing and fun to watch the updates
- 2024-02-10 00:41:23
-
- A few of the pieces form The Estate of Charles W. Montgomery rolled into the recent December Heritage auction and I did pick up another of the collection, a J653 … a 1$ Gold pattern stuck in Aluminum. Not a high-end piece but fairly rare. Saul with Uspatterns.com identified 6 examples so far which would make this Judd a High R7 vs the low R7 noted in the Judd reference book. https://uspatterns.store.turbify.net/j653p726.html While most of the 1868 Aluminum sets have now been broken up, Bill Rue’s pattern sale database recorded the 1st 1868 Aluminum set being auctioned in Ebenezer Mason’s Oct 1870 sale, however there was a single 1$ pieced also auction at the time. I am not sure what to make of the apparent die rust on the reverse which might imply this was a later restrike or just a aluminum planchet issue as minted or from over time?
A few of the pieces form The Estate of Charles W. Montgomery rolled into the recent December Heritage auction and I did pick up another of the collection, a J653 … a 1$ Gold pattern stuck in Aluminum. Not a high-end piece but fairly rare. Saul with Uspatterns.com identified 6 examples so far which would make this Judd a High R7 vs the low R7 noted in the Judd reference book. https://uspatterns.store.turbify.net/j653p726.html While most of the 1868 Aluminum sets have now been broken up, Bill Rue’s pattern sale database recorded the 1st 1868 Aluminum set being auctioned in Ebenezer Mason’s Oct 1870 sale, however there was a single 1$ pieced also auction at the time. I am not sure what to make of the apparent die rust on the reverse which might imply this was a later restrike or just a aluminum planchet issue as minted or from over time?2 Comments 0 Shares 480 ViewsCommenting is disabled.- The 1868 Aluminum set sold for $108.50 by Mason on 10/4/1870. Subsequently was re-catalogued and placed for sale on 2/16/1871 by Mason with each coin being sold either individually or as a set . All lots were passed. Interestingly, the 7/28/1881 Chapman sale and the 2/16/1882 H. G. Sampson sale state that only 5 sets were produced. In the 3c pattern world, there are 6 trime aluminum patterns that I have identifed potentially but there may be an opportunity to consolidate to 5 as old catalog pictures are suspicious but not conclusive that what is listed as 2 different coins may be one. There are 8 3c nickel patterns known. In the Lyman Low 6/28/1887 Linderman collection (past Mint director) had sets and individual coins. So perhaps not unusual a singleton existing out of a set. Evidently he was known to have coins struck to his desire. As it turns out the 1868 Aluminum sets and individual coins were confiscated by the US Government as they were not authorized perhaps suggesting a later re-striking by Linderman. They did not show up in the subsequent re-sale of the Linderman collection by Scott Stamp and coin in 1888The 1868 Aluminum set sold for $108.50 by Mason on 10/4/1870. Subsequently was re-catalogued and placed for sale on 2/16/1871 by Mason with each coin being sold either individually or as a set . All lots were passed. Interestingly, the 7/28/1881 Chapman sale and the 2/16/1882 H. G. Sampson sale state that only 5 sets were produced. In the 3c pattern world, there are 6 trime aluminum patterns that I have identifed potentially but there may be an opportunity to consolidate to 5 as old catalog pictures are suspicious but not conclusive that what is listed as 2 different coins may be one. There are 8 3c nickel patterns known. In the Lyman Low 6/28/1887 Linderman collection (past Mint director) had sets and individual coins. So perhaps not unusual a singleton existing out of a set. Evidently he was known to have coins struck to his desire. As it turns out the 1868 Aluminum sets and individual coins were confiscated by the US Government as they were not authorized perhaps suggesting a later re-striking by Linderman. They did not show up in the subsequent re-sale of the Linderman collection by Scott Stamp and coin in 1888
- 2023-12-25 02:05:50
-
-
-
- I noted USpatterns.com just added a consolidated price list of patterns from Heritage’s Nov 16/17 Dallas auction.
https://uspatterns.com/heno20sa2.html https://uspatterns.com/heno20sa2.html auction.
A majority were from the Charles Montgomery estate and exhibited a nice collection of off-metal gold patterns. I was able to win a couple of the patterns that I had my eye on in prior auctions of Bass and Simpson and please I was able to win them at the level I was willing to bid. I presume most of patterns may have been assembled about 20 + years ago as several had the Bass (1999) pedigree as well as Pittman and not appeared in auctions since 2000 or so.
I made the comment a few months back that I completed a 6 piece set of “GOD OUR TRUST“ Eagle patterns in copper that took years to assemble and then Heritage started to load this set up onto their site. Montgomery’s collection had many of these samples that included duplicate in Gilt.
Over-all,I thought the collection was a nice balance of grade and scarcity that the price levels appeared reasonable. Some pieces, I thought, were even cheap when comparing to other auctions.
I wonder what other pattern collectors thought?
I noted USpatterns.com just added a consolidated price list of patterns from Heritage’s Nov 16/17 Dallas auction. https://uspatterns.com/heno20sa2.html https://uspatterns.com/heno20sa2.html auction. A majority were from the Charles Montgomery estate and exhibited a nice collection of off-metal gold patterns. I was able to win a couple of the patterns that I had my eye on in prior auctions of Bass and Simpson and please I was able to win them at the level I was willing to bid. I presume most of patterns may have been assembled about 20 + years ago as several had the Bass (1999) pedigree as well as Pittman and not appeared in auctions since 2000 or so. I made the comment a few months back that I completed a 6 piece set of “GOD OUR TRUST“ Eagle patterns in copper that took years to assemble and then Heritage started to load this set up onto their site. Montgomery’s collection had many of these samples that included duplicate in Gilt. Over-all,I thought the collection was a nice balance of grade and scarcity that the price levels appeared reasonable. Some pieces, I thought, were even cheap when comparing to other auctions. I wonder what other pattern collectors thought?6 Comments 0 Shares 925 ViewsCommenting is disabled.- Congrats on picking some up ... and I agree that the FUN auction appear to be setting the stage for some high activity - all high end and POP 1 kind of pieces ... I have an eye on a couple and I keep my fingers cross that other bidders may run out of interest or funds when they come up but then again I will not bet on it.Congrats on picking some up ... and I agree that the FUN auction appear to be setting the stage for some high activity - all high end and POP 1 kind of pieces ... I have an eye on a couple and I keep my fingers cross that other bidders may run out of interest or funds when they come up but then again I will not bet on it.
- 2023-12-03 16:23:01
- I also managed to buy some patterns in that sale, and not just from the Montgomery collection. For better or worse, I don't expect the Simpson and Cape Coral patterns in the FUN auction to be as buyable.I also managed to buy some patterns in that sale, and not just from the Montgomery collection. For better or worse, I don't expect the Simpson and Cape Coral patterns in the FUN auction to be as buyable.
- 2023-12-02 03:14:03
-
- Hi Retirednow, I am looking for a copper Restrike 1827 quarter if you ever see one offered. ThanksHi Retirednow, I am looking for a copper Restrike 1827 quarter if you ever see one offered. Thanks
- 2023-11-23 14:56:07
- [Coinbert]
- 2023-11-24 21:46:03
- will do ... though unlikely, I do not travel to shows so my network is more limited but just in case, if I come across one I will reach out to youwill do ... though unlikely, I do not travel to shows so my network is more limited but just in case, if I come across one I will reach out to you
- 2023-11-24 21:47:35
-
- I enjoy assembling various pattern type sets that display the various obverse / reverse motifs. I am happy that I just completed another one … a 4 piece Indian Princess 10 Cent sample set. I assemble these independent of the material they were struck in and edge types – mainly because I do not have enough life span to narrow these down.
My set is shown below and the piece I just added was a J-1077. This piece had been cleaned (I guess we like to say restored) in the few last years. It turns out this piece is a match to the Willaim Rau / Harry Bass (1999) piece as a PCGS64. In my eyes, it is 10 times improvement in eye appeal now. The Piece since In Rua hands (NGC65) has been regraded twice (once back to PCGS64 and now NGC64 6680463-005 ).
I enjoy assembling various pattern type sets that display the various obverse / reverse motifs. I am happy that I just completed another one … a 4 piece Indian Princess 10 Cent sample set. I assemble these independent of the material they were struck in and edge types – mainly because I do not have enough life span to narrow these down. My set is shown below and the piece I just added was a J-1077. This piece had been cleaned (I guess we like to say restored) in the few last years. It turns out this piece is a match to the Willaim Rau / Harry Bass (1999) piece as a PCGS64. In my eyes, it is 10 times improvement in eye appeal now. The Piece since In Rua hands (NGC65) has been regraded twice (once back to PCGS64 and now NGC64 6680463-005 ).0 Comments 0 Shares 688 Views - Does anyone have any knowledge if either an updated Judd or Pollock type reference is being worked on or maybe just a completely new reference on patterns will be published? I had recall reading a post a couple of years back about an update was being worked? Not sure if Roger was working to publish more works on patterns?Does anyone have any knowledge if either an updated Judd or Pollock type reference is being worked on or maybe just a completely new reference on patterns will be published? I had recall reading a post a couple of years back about an update was being worked? Not sure if Roger was working to publish more works on patterns?3 Comments 0 Shares 723 ViewsCommenting is disabled.
- I have heard of no real momentum for update on the Judd Book quite yet. In my realm of the pattern world, I will be publishing a 350 page book specific to 3C patterns that should be printed in spring . Updates rarity scale on over 50% of them, consolidates and proposes elimination of some Judd numbers and suggests additions of others based on metal testing and other researchI have heard of no real momentum for update on the Judd Book quite yet. In my realm of the pattern world, I will be publishing a 350 page book specific to 3C patterns that should be printed in spring . Updates rarity scale on over 50% of them, consolidates and proposes elimination of some Judd numbers and suggests additions of others based on metal testing and other research
- 2023-10-05 23:58:20
-
- Nice ... loo,Nice ... loo,
- 2023-10-06 02:25:35
- Nice ... looking forward to your book ... u have a great collection and I enjoy the comments and pedigrees listed on your pieces.Nice ... looking forward to your book ... u have a great collection and I enjoy the comments and pedigrees listed on your pieces.
- 2023-10-06 02:28:08
-
- let's post some more 5 Cent patterns. My type set of 1866 Washington 5 Cent Patterns.let's post some more 5 Cent patterns. My type set of 1866 Washington 5 Cent Patterns.2 Comments 0 Shares 687 ViewsCommenting is disabled.
-
- It would be nice if one could use MARK Downs when adding their comments (like bold facing, indenting, paragraphs etc), especially when one add owners comments to their inventory pieces, As of now, all text just ends up a in long line.It would be nice if one could use MARK Downs when adding their comments (like bold facing, indenting, paragraphs etc), especially when one add owners comments to their inventory pieces, As of now, all text just ends up a in long line.1 Comments 0 Shares 1197 ViewsCommenting is disabled.
- OK newlines are working now for public and private notes on sets and inventory items. Thanks for picking this up.
As for more extensive formatting options we've got that on the todo list.OK newlines are working now for public and private notes on sets and inventory items. Thanks for picking this up. As for more extensive formatting options we've got that on the todo list.- 2023-08-11 02:57:48
-
-
- I like dedicated specialty groups in MYCOLLECTIONS ... thanks for setting this one up.
I though I share a photo layout of my sampling of pattern shield nickels - I like to call this my type set. I do not think I will seek any other samples but one never knowsI like dedicated specialty groups in MYCOLLECTIONS ... thanks for setting this one up. I though I share a photo layout of my sampling of pattern shield nickels - I like to call this my type set. I do not think I will seek any other samples but one never knows1 Comments 0 Shares 845 ViewsCommenting is disabled.- I would like to add some comments about my type set of shield patterns nickels that I posted here. Please feel free to add any of your thoughts.
1866 J-595 / Pollock-582.
The piece was struck in copper with a reeded edge, It is a nicely struck piece with nice hues with reflective fields especially rotated under a light. It does have a pedigree marker to help trace it – appears to me as some sort of die spalling at base of the “5”.
This is a High R.7 rarity with only possibly 8 unique specimens (one being impounded in a museum) had been traced by Saul Techiman - using auction photos/plates for comparison. One of these, were noted could be one of the other 4 as the auction photo was dark
My piece is from the Lemus Collection (Heritage 10/2009 Lot1260), Pollock noted this specific piece in his reference book with the technical aspects of 55.7 grains .809 diameter. Pollock also referenced a list of pedigree’s as
Ex: J. Brenner; F.C.C. Boyd; King Farouk; Palace Collections of Egypt (Sotheby's, 2/1954), lot 1800; Hirt (Pine Tree, 11/1975), lot 249; Auction '84 (Superior, 7/1984) -$1210), lot 492; and then it became The Lemus Collection, Queller Family Collection Part Two (Heritage, 1/2009), lot 1660,
Pollock listed pedigrees were the same prestige owners, as were listed by Superior in their 7/84 “Auction 84” Lot #492 catalog. However, USPattern.com concluded that those listed before the Hirt Pine Tree 11/75 auction cannot be verified. i.e. J. Brenner; F.C.C. Boyd; and King Farouk; Palace Collections.
Looking at Bill Rue historical pattern auction listing, this piece only appeared 19 times since 1954 and no prior listings. My piece made up of 5 of those 19 listings.
I would like to add some comments about my type set of shield patterns nickels that I posted here. Please feel free to add any of your thoughts. 1866 J-595 / Pollock-582. The piece was struck in copper with a reeded edge, It is a nicely struck piece with nice hues with reflective fields especially rotated under a light. It does have a pedigree marker to help trace it – appears to me as some sort of die spalling at base of the “5”. This is a High R.7 rarity with only possibly 8 unique specimens (one being impounded in a museum) had been traced by Saul Techiman - using auction photos/plates for comparison. One of these, were noted could be one of the other 4 as the auction photo was dark My piece is from the Lemus Collection (Heritage 10/2009 Lot1260), Pollock noted this specific piece in his reference book with the technical aspects of 55.7 grains .809 diameter. Pollock also referenced a list of pedigree’s as Ex: J. Brenner; F.C.C. Boyd; King Farouk; Palace Collections of Egypt (Sotheby's, 2/1954), lot 1800; Hirt (Pine Tree, 11/1975), lot 249; Auction '84 (Superior, 7/1984) -$1210), lot 492; and then it became The Lemus Collection, Queller Family Collection Part Two (Heritage, 1/2009), lot 1660, Pollock listed pedigrees were the same prestige owners, as were listed by Superior in their 7/84 “Auction 84” Lot #492 catalog. However, USPattern.com concluded that those listed before the Hirt Pine Tree 11/75 auction cannot be verified. i.e. J. Brenner; F.C.C. Boyd; and King Farouk; Palace Collections. Looking at Bill Rue historical pattern auction listing, this piece only appeared 19 times since 1954 and no prior listings. My piece made up of 5 of those 19 listings.- 2023-09-12 21:10:18
-
- I've just acquired this invalid coin mention. From The Bob Simpson Collection Pt 2, Heritage Nov 2020 Auction /Lot 3096,
I tracked image to several priors ...
Heritage June 2005 Long Beach (From The Western Hill Collection) / Lot #7353 (as NGC65RB);
David Akers Oct 1997 The John Jay Pittman Collection: Part 1 / Lot # 770 ($3080) with Note Prior Purchased by John Pittman for 55$ as Lot 5 from Abe Kosoff’s 1958 ANA Convention sale
_________________________________________________
Characteristics:
Noted priors that several blatant engraving errors clearly show, including an E originally cut in place of the Ain STATES, and the 6 first erroneously punched in the 3’s position. Sharply struck with a high wire rim. There are some light hairlines in the fields as well as several spots.
A die break runs in three directions from the eagle's right wing: 1) through the left side of the A to the rim; 2) down through the cloud and the stop between the date and AMERICA to the rim; and 3) from the top of the eagle's wing into the field, past the eagle's beak toward the E in STATES. Struck with dies parallel to each other, i.e. rotated 180 degrees from the normal “coin turn” of U.S. coinage.
These characteristics indicate that this is a Restrike minted maybe 20 years after 1836. This is a R.6 with an estimated 20-25 examples knownI've just acquired this [coin:79e1cda7-2ef0-11ee-bdc5-060e37a4c43f]. From The Bob Simpson Collection Pt 2, Heritage Nov 2020 Auction /Lot 3096, I tracked image to several priors ... Heritage June 2005 Long Beach (From The Western Hill Collection) / Lot #7353 (as NGC65RB); David Akers Oct 1997 The John Jay Pittman Collection: Part 1 / Lot # 770 ($3080) with Note Prior Purchased by John Pittman for 55$ as Lot 5 from Abe Kosoff’s 1958 ANA Convention sale _________________________________________________ Characteristics: Noted priors that several blatant engraving errors clearly show, including an E originally cut in place of the Ain STATES, and the 6 first erroneously punched in the 3’s position. Sharply struck with a high wire rim. There are some light hairlines in the fields as well as several spots. A die break runs in three directions from the eagle's right wing: 1) through the left side of the A to the rim; 2) down through the cloud and the stop between the date and AMERICA to the rim; and 3) from the top of the eagle's wing into the field, past the eagle's beak toward the E in STATES. Struck with dies parallel to each other, i.e. rotated 180 degrees from the normal “coin turn” of U.S. coinage. These characteristics indicate that this is a Restrike minted maybe 20 years after 1836. This is a R.6 with an estimated 20-25 examples known0 Comments 0 Shares 1017 Views -
-
More Posts
© 2024 MyCollect