Coinbowlllc | MyCollect

I've added these coins to my inventory:

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

I've added these coins to my inventory: • [coin:282425ca-0068-11f0-8d73-0660ea78a99b] • [coin:2824b544-0068-11f0-83a6-0660ea78a99b] • [coin:28250012-0068-11f0-88e0-0660ea78a99b] • [coin:282510de-0068-11f0-bea3-0660ea78a99b] • [coin:28251fc0-0068-11f0-b16b-0660ea78a99b] • [coin:282538a2-0068-11f0-90af-0660ea78a99b] • [coin:28254694-0068-11f0-afd2-0660ea78a99b] • [coin:282568ea-0068-11f0-88d2-0660ea78a99b] • [coin:28257682-0068-11f0-ac8f-0660ea78a99b] • [coin:282584a6-0068-11f0-a95c-0660ea78a99b]

0 Comments 0 Shares 679 Views

Commenting is disabled.

ToddPollock

I will get it removed. The PCGS coin number is actually for a RB causing this issue. Please let me know on these or report them. JackFitch

I will get it removed. The PCGS coin number is actually for a RB causing this issue. Please let me know on these or report them. [JackFitch]
- 1

ToddPollock

The coin's label has coin number 2128, which is for RB. So a weird mechanical error of sorts. I will remove it from GTG. Oddly enough under that number the pop report does not show this one but shows coins in grades, 10, 12, 15 and 40.

The coin's label has coin number 2128, which is for RB. So a weird mechanical error of sorts. I will remove it from GTG. Oddly enough under that number the pop report does not show this one but shows coins in grades, 10, 12, 15 and 40.
- 1
Samthecoinman

This coin is obviously red brown! Maybe red. I'm only surprised they didnt call it ms67

This coin is obviously red brown! Maybe red. I'm only surprised they didnt call it ms67 😂
- 1

crepidodera

I gave that same coin 63+ as well. There are so many Morgan dollars, I thought it looked familiar, but I wasn't sure. Not close to MS66!

I gave that same coin 63+ as well. There are so many Morgan dollars, I thought it looked familiar, but I wasn't sure. Not close to MS66!
- 2
RyanG

Its always tough to grade with photos but at least we all have that handicap for this game. It probably has great luster and the chatter is just highlighted more from the reflectivity. That happens sometimes and makes it tougher to grade. The rev. has lots of die scratches too, making it harder, but looks like a 67, maybe even better. The obv looks like a 65 to me. Most TPG's go by the lesser of the two for the grade I believe. Possible because the coin is common they didn't care as much.

Its always tough to grade with photos but at least we all have that handicap for this game. It probably has great luster and the chatter is just highlighted more from the reflectivity. That happens sometimes and makes it tougher to grade. The rev. has lots of die scratches too, making it harder, but looks like a 67, maybe even better. The obv looks like a 65 to me. Most TPG's go by the lesser of the two for the grade I believe. Possible because the coin is common they didn't care as much.
- 2
Tsevni2

Like I have always said, we have all seen mistakes, as long as humans involved they will continue, even the highly regarded CACG will have mistakes floating around in time.

Like I have always said, we have all seen mistakes, as long as humans involved they will continue, even the highly regarded CACG will have mistakes floating around in time.
- 2
westcoin

A MS64 to me, so not far off what you gave it. Not close to a MS66 IMHO. However, in hand, a coin can look very different; it is only practice to grade from static photos, lighting, and even a subtle change in direction of scattering light across the coin's surface can have extreme differences in appearance, so it's all just elemental anyway.

A MS64 to me, so not far off what you gave it. Not close to a MS66 IMHO. However, in hand, a coin can look very different; it is only practice to grade from static photos, lighting, and even a subtle change in direction of scattering light across the coin's surface can have extreme differences in appearance, so it's all just elemental anyway.
- 2
YN_Evan2010

I would've said 64, shot 65 (so 64+)

I would've said 64, shot 65 (so 64+)
- 3

ToddPollock

I have fixed the suffix on this so it will show PL tomorrow.

I have fixed the suffix on this so it will show PL tomorrow.
- 1
- Coinbowlllc
  
  ToddPollock I just noticed, this is actually a 1971, not 1980. Do you need a picture? Thanks,'
  
  [ToddPollock] I just noticed, this is actually a 1971, not 1980. Do you need a picture? Thanks,'
- ToddPollock
  
  Coinbowlllc All good will get it fixed.
  
  [Coinbowlllc] All good will get it fixed.